2000 JTR(SC) 742
2003 ACJ 227 ; 2001 AIR(SCW) 2336 ; 2000 41 AllLR 108 ; 2000 9 JT 632 ; 2001 9 SCC 723 ; 2001 AIRSCW 2336 ; 2001 KHC 4007 ; 2001 3 Supreme 543
2001(3) Supreme 543
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.T. Thomas and R.P. Sethi, JJ.
Dolly Kantibhai Patel -Petitioner
versus
Ballu Tukaram Auhad & Ors. -Respondents
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 326 of 1999
Decided on 7-4-2000
Act Referred :CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE : S.25
(A) The Civil Procedure Code, Section 25, provides the statutory basis for the transfer of a pending motor accident claim from one Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to another, where the interests of justice and convenience so require, taking into account the location of witnesses, parties, and the competent forum for adjudication in this case.
(B) The core legal principles involve the doctrine of forum convenience, the right to prosecute a claim through an authorized representative, and the discretion of the tribunal to order transfer of proceedings to ensure fair and efficient resolution.
Facts of the case:
A claim for compensation was filed by a petitioner before a motor accident claims tribunal at Nasik. The petitioner sustained injuries, left for the United States, and all other vehicle occupants hailed from Vadodara. The power of attorney holder and the respondent insurance company are based at Vadodara.
Findings of Court:
It was found that no one else at Nasik could prosecute the claim on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent insurer has a branch at Vadodara, making it convenient for the respondent to resist the claim at the transferee forum.
Issues:
Whether the claim should be transferred from M.A.C.T. Nasik to the Principal M.A.C.T. Vadodara on grounds of inconvenience and lack of prosecution capacity at the current location.
Ratio Decidendi:
The transfer is deemed just and proper considering the absence of a suitable representative at Nasik, the connection of all other parties and the power of attorney holder to Vadodara, and the convenience of the respondent insurer, warranting transfer under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Result:
The transfer petition is allowed, and the case is ordered to be transferred to the Principal M.A.C.T. Vadodara.
(A) The Civil Procedure Code, Section 25, provides the statutory basis for the transfer of a pending motor accident claim from one Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to another, where the interests of justice and convenience so require, taking into account the location of witnesses, parties, and the competent forum for adjudication in this case.
(B) The core legal principles involve the doctrine of forum convenience, the right to prosecute a claim through an authorized representative, and the discretion of the tribunal to order transfer of proceedings to ensure fair and efficient resolution.
Facts of the case:
A claim for compensation was filed by a petitioner before a motor accident claims tribunal at Nasik. The petitioner sustained injuries, left for the United States, and all other vehicle occupants hailed from Vadodara. The power of attorney holder and the respondent insurance company are based at Vadodara.
Findings of Court:
It was found that no one else at Nasik could prosecute the claim on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent insurer has a branch at Vadodara, making it convenient for the respondent to resist the claim at the transferee forum.
Issues:
Whether the claim should be transferred from M.A.C.T. Nasik to the Principal M.A.C.T. Vadodara on grounds of inconvenience and lack of prosecution capacity at the current location.
Ratio Decidendi:
The transfer is deemed just and proper considering the absence of a suitable representative at Nasik, the connection of all other parties and the power of attorney holder to Vadodara, and the convenience of the respondent insurer, warranting transfer under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Result:
The transfer petition is allowed, and the case is ordered to be transferred to the Principal M.A.C.T. Vadodara.
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2. A claim for compensation has filed by this petitioner before the Motor Accident Claims tribunal, Nasik (MAHARASHTRA) . The petitioner who sustained many injuries has gone back to United States thereafter where he was living earlier. This petition is for transferring the aforesaid claim from M.A.C.T. Nasik to Vadodara (Gujarat) on the ground that there is none else at Nasik to prosecute the claim on behalf of the injured petitioner. It is said that all the other occupants of the vehicle who were involved in the accident hailed from Vadodara (Gujarat) and the power of attorney holder of the petitioner is also a resident of Vadodara itself. The respondent - insurance Company has its own branch office at Vadodara and therefore, it would be convenient for the respondent for resisting the claim.
3. For these reasons , we deem it just and proper to allow the transfer prayed for. Accordingly, we order M.A.C.P. No. 499/1993 titled as Dolly Kantibhai Patel v. Balu Tukaram Auhad and Ors. pending before the M.A.C.T. Nasik (Mah.) to be transferred to the Principal M.A.C.T. Vadodara. The application for impleading legal heirs of respondent No. 2 can be followed up before the transferee court.
4. Hence this Transfer Petition is allowed.
Application allowed.
***************